Drinking Blood and Eating Flesh: Corpse Medicine in Early Modern England

Mumia; Head of a Mummy, used for wound healing and plasters until the end of the 18th century.

In order to restore youth to an aging body, the fifteenth-century practitioner, Marsilio Ficino, advised:

There is a common and ancient opinion that certain prophetic women who are popularly called ‘screech-owls’ suck the blood of infants as a means, insofar as they can, of growing young again. Why shouldn’t our old people, namely those who have no [other] recourse, likewise suck the blood of a youth? — a youth, I say who is willing, healthy, happy and temperate, whose blood is of the best but perhaps too abundant. They will suck, therefore, like leeches, an ounce or two from a scarcely- opened vein of the left arm; they will immediately take an equal amount of sugar and wine; they will do this when hungry and thirsty and when the moon is waxing. If they have difficulty digesting raw blood, let it first be cooked together with sugar; or let it be mixed with sugar and moderately distilled over hot water and then drunk. [1]

At first glance, cannibalistic medical practices such as this seem far removed from our own culture. However, the utilisation of body parts for medicinal purposes still persists today, albeit in different forms. Although blood transfusions or organ transplantation may seem dramatically different than drinking the blood or eating the flesh of another human being, these medical practices do share a common belief in the body as an instrument of healing.

Blood, in particular, featured prominently in the treatment of the sick during the early modern period as it was central to the Galenic model of health which was dependent on a balance of the body’s four humours (blood, phlegm, black bile and yellow bile). The image of a patient being bled—his sleeve rolled up, blood pouring from an opened vein into a bowl placed below his elbow—is one which is familiar to us. Less familiar, however, is the image of epileptic patients crowded around the scaffold, cups in hand, waiting to ‘quaff the red blood as it flows from the still quavering body’ of a freshly executed criminal. [2] Thus, blood could be both contaminating in its excess and restorative in its replenishment.

The surgeon’s association with blood contributed to the duality of his image during the early modern period. Like blood, he had both the power to heal and the power to harm. [3] Not only would the surgeon come into contact with blood through surgical procedures, but he might also taste a person’s blood in order to test its consistency when attempting to diagnosis his patient.

Medicinal cannibalism existed in other forms as well. One of the most common human substances used by apothecaries during the early modern period was mummy, a ‘medicinal preparation of the remains of an embalmed, dried, or otherwise “prepared” body that had ideally met with sudden, preferably violent death’. [4] Sometimes referred to as ‘the menstruation of the dead’, this remedy was recommended to patients as late as 1747. In The Marrow of Physick (1669), Thomas Brugis wrote:

A Mans Skull that hath been dead but one yeare, bury it in the Ashes behinde the fire, and let it burne untill it be very white, and easie to be broken with your finger; then take off all the uppermost part of the Head to the top of the Crowne, and beat it as small as is possible; then grate a Nutmeg, and put to it, and the blood of a Dog dryed, and powdered; mingle them all together, and give the sick to drinke, first and last, both when he is sick, and also when he is well, the quantity of halfe a Dram at a time in white Wine. [5]

Although the sixteenth-century surgeon, Ambrose Paré, noted that mummy (or mumia as it was sometimes known) was ‘the very first and last medicine of almost all our practitioners’ against bruising, the substance did not come cheap. In 1678, a pound of mummy could cost as much as 5s 4d. [6] Thus, many apothecaries substituted mummy with cheap imitations that typically came from the corpses of beggars, lepers and plague victims.

As popular as ‘corpse medicine’ was during the early modern period, this does not mean it was not without its critics, many of whom described these remedies as cannibalistic and unnatural. By the late eighteenth century, practitioners had stopped prescribing ‘three drams of [crushed] human skull’ for epilepsy, or ‘two ounces of mummy in a plaster against ruptures’. [7] However, the concept of the body as an instrument of healing continued to persist, and indeed, still exists today albeit in a much more dehumanised (mechanised) form.

1. Marsilio Ficino, De Vita II (1489), 11: 196-199. Translated by Sergius Kodera.

2. Mabel Peacock, ‘Executed Criminals and Folk Medicine’, Folklore 7 (1896), p. 274.

3. P. Kenneth Himmelmann, ‘The Medicinal Body: An Analysis of Medicinal Cannibalism in Europe, 1300-1700’, Anthropology 22 (1997), pp. 192.

4. Karen Gordon-Grube, ‘Anthropophagy in Post-Renaissance Europe: The Traiditon of Medicinal Cannibalism’, American Anthropologist, 90 (1988), p. 406.

5. Thomas Brugis, The Marrow of Physick (London, 1669), p. 65.

6. Richard Sugg, ‘“Good Physic but Bad Food”: Early Modern Attitudes to Medicinal Cannibalism and its Suppliers’, Social History of Medicine, 19:2 (2006), p. 227.

7. J. Quincy (ed.), The Dispensatory of the Royal College of Physicians (London, 1721), pp. 86, 221.

12 comments on “Drinking Blood and Eating Flesh: Corpse Medicine in Early Modern England

  1. […] Fitzharris, L. 2011. Drinking Blood and Eating Flesh: Corpse Medicine in Early Modern England. Chirurgeon’s Apprentice. http://thechirurgeonsapprentice.com/2011/02/25/drinking-blood-and-eating-flesh-corpse-medicine-in-ea… […]

  2. [...] For instance, it was widely thought that the hand of an executed criminal could cure a variety of ailments—ulcers, scrofula, cysts and even goitres. As soon as the victim had been pronounced dead, a crowd of people would surge forward to touch the cooling hand of the corpse dangling from the noose. Similar beliefs surrounded the blood of those unfortunate souls who lost their heads on the scaffold. Many people gathered close to catch the hot liquid as it spurted from the severed arteries of the neck; the blood was then drank, hot and thick, by epileptics hoping desperately to cure their debilitating and misunderstood disease. [For more on medicinal cannibalism, click here]. [...]

  3. A person essentially lend a hand to make critically posts I’d state. That is the first time I frequented your web page and so far? I surprised with the analysis you made to create this particular submit amazing. Fantastic activity!

  4. [...] For instance, it was widely thought that the hand of an executed criminal could cure a variety of ailments—ulcers, scrofula, cysts and even goitres. As soon as the victim had been pronounced dead, a crowd of people would surge forward to touch the cooling hand of the corpse dangling from the noose. Similar beliefs surrounded the blood of those unfortunate souls who lost their heads on the scaffold. Many people gathered close to catch the hot liquid as it spurted from the severed arteries of the neck; the blood was then drank, hot and thick, by epileptics hoping desperately to cure their debilitating and misunderstood disease. [For more on medicinal cannibalism, click here]. [...]

  5. [...] *This article originally appeared on The Chirurgeon’s Apprentice.  [...]

  6. [...] for fun this Halloween, you can check out this website that is “dedicated to the horrors of pre-anesthetic surgery” as well as human [...]

  7. Pat Bowne says:

    Very interesting! I’ll be teaching about blood soon, and will horrify my students with some of these stories.
    Our museum has a mummy exhibit going on which includes an apothecary’s jar containing some mumia, and a German medicinal book listing the prices for it.

  8. [...] a wonderful post about the machines of Augustino Ramelli. The Chirugeon’s Apprentice  offers us lots of blood. Even more wonderful and mysterious is the Voynich Manuscript. Also one of our favourite subjects [...]

  9. Jeb says:

    Very nice! Helps me to make sense of this and a range of other material.

    “Alsoe the Gaules used to drincke ther enymyes blood, and to paynte themselves therewith: soe alsoe they wright, that the ould Irish were wonte, and soe have I sene some of the Irish doe, but not theire enymyes but frendes bloode. As namely at the execution of a notable traytor at Lymbricke, called Murrogh Obrien, I saw an ould woman, which was his foster mother, tooke up his heade, whilst he was quartered, and sucked up all the blood running thereout, saying, that the earth was not worthy to drincke it, and therewith also steeped her face and brest, and tare her heare, crying and shriking out most terribly. ”

    Edmund Spencer A Veue of the present state of Irelande [1596]

    • Mike says:

      In that case you will probably enjoy Richard Suggs’ recent book on the subject,’Mummies, Cannibals and Vampires: The History of Corpse Medicine from the Renaissance to the Victorians’ (2011)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s